feat: add LexAI status bar and suggestion panel
Some checks failed
CI — Test & Build / Test & Build (push) Has been cancelled

- Implemented a status bar item for LexAI with dynamic status updates (ready, processing, notReady).
- Created a suggestion panel for displaying and interacting with AI-generated suggestions.
- Added functionality for accepting, regenerating, and discarding suggestions within the suggestion zone.
- Introduced configuration options for writing style, prompt patterns, personas, and formats.
- Integrated progress indicators for long-running tasks and improved user feedback.
- Established TypeScript configuration for the vscode package.
This commit is contained in:
john kevin asprec
2026-08-13 18:06:45 +08:00
parent fc19ead0a7
commit 8bc529ef2d
84 changed files with 10025 additions and 662 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
---
name: attack-surface
description: Build and maintain docs/attacksurface.md — a living inventory of everything deployed (sites, APIs, databases, vendors, hosts) with tech, auth, exposure, and known misconfigurations. Use when adding or changing infrastructure, before a security review, or on a scheduled cadence.
---
Maintain `docs/attacksurface.md` as the single running inventory of this project's deployed attack surface. Do not create exploit code or test against systems the user has not authorized.
1. Read `docs/attacksurface.md` (create it from the template below if absent), `docs/ARCHITECTURE.md`, and infra/config sources actually present: IaC, `Dockerfile`/compose, CI configs, `.env.example`, deploy manifests, and dependency manifests. Prefer evidence in the repo over assumption; list unknowns rather than guessing.
2. For each deployed asset, capture: name, type (web property / API / database / queue / job / static site), tech and version, self-hosted vs third-party, how you authenticate into it, audience/exposure (public / internal / VPN / token / OAuth), the defenses in place, and the common misconfigurations and CVE classes for that platform.
3. Update the inventory in place: add new assets, revise changed ones, and mark retired ones. Keep each entry to a scannable row plus notes — this is a control plane, not a report.
4. Recommend a testing/review cadence per asset based on criticality × exposure × change rate (e.g. public auth endpoint = frequent; internal cron = rare).
5. Never write secrets, tokens, credentials, or live keys into the file. Reference where a secret lives, not its value.
## docs/attacksurface.md template
```markdown
# Attack surface
> Living inventory of everything deployed and its exposure. Updated whenever infrastructure changes and before each security review. Contains no secrets — only references to where secrets live.
## Assets
| Asset | Type | Tech / version | Hosted | Auth in | Exposure | Defenses | Review cadence |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [name] | [web/API/db/...] | [stack] | [self/3p] | [OAuth/key/...] | [public/internal/VPN] | [WAF, ratelimit, ...] | [freq] |
## Per-asset notes
### [asset name]
- **Common misconfigs / CVE classes:** [platform-specific]
- **Known exposure:** [what an attacker reaches, from where]
- **Secrets location:** [vault/manager path — not the value]
- **Last reviewed:** [date + result]
## Gaps / unknowns
- [asset or config not yet mapped]
```